PRESIDENT'S VIEW
by Edward W McIntyre (immediate Past-President, Massachusetts Bar Association), May 2009
by Edward W McIntyre (immediate Past-President, Massachusetts Bar Association), May 2009
Simply defined, therapeutic jurisprudence is the use of social sciences to examine how the law impacts the well-being of those it serves.As a profession, we may underestimate our ability to calm a situation.
"The mere presence of a lawyer can bring comfort and solace to a person in need of help," according to American Bar Association Past President Dennis W. Archer. "Knowing that, we can positively affect change in what may otherwise be a difficult, adversarial situation."
Is our potential ability to heal an otherwise conflicted situation compatible with our primary duties as advisors, advocates and counselors?
Florida Coastal School of Law Professor Susan Daicoff believes so. She writes, "Law as a healing profession has great transformational potential...It could make the legal system a more inspiring, humane, and hospitable place for clients, lawyers, judges, and indeed society as a whole."
The late Warren E. Burger, former chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, echoed the concept while speaking at the 1983 ABA Midyear Meeting —"the original role of lawyers was healing social conflict." He went on to urge the profession to return to and embrace that role again. Revisiting that theme a year later, Burger said, "The entire legal profession ... has become so mesmerized with the stimulation of the courtroom contest that we tend to forget that we ought to be healers of conflict .... Trial by adversarial contest must in time go the way of the ancient trial by battle and blood .... Our system has become too costly, too painful, too destructive, and too inefficient for truly civilized people."
Last fall (2009), at the University of Windsor Eleventh Colloquim on the Legal Profession, Archer said, "On an individual level, if we approach our life's work as healers, if we reorient our thinking to take advantage of the power of healing, we can do much good for our clients and others." The approach Archer mentions is timeless.
In modern times, healing and mediation are embodied in an evolving "therapeutic jurisprudence" movement. Simply defined, therapeutic jurisprudence is the use of social sciences to examine how the law impacts the well-being of those it serves. Professor Bruce Winick, a scholar of therapeutic jurisprudence encourages attorneys to see themselves as therapeutic agents. "Lawyers should seek to apply an ethic of care in their .practices, and the profession should teach this to subsequent generations."
In 2000, the Conference of Chief Justices and the Conference of State Court Administrators joined the lawyer-as-healer discussion with joint resolutions centered on unconventional processes to address complex social issues and problems; a focus on remedies; and the benefits of therapeutic jurisprudence.
Currently, therapeutic efforts are being applied in experimental pilots. Two involve domestic relations proceedings and the use of non-adversarial language in filings and pleadings.
Applying these thoughtful and wise principles more broadly in earnest today may help bring about Chief Justice Burger's vision of legal professionals as "healers of conflict." (All emphasis by R. Isacoff)
Author's Copyright (as applicable) by Richard I Isacoff, Esq, December 2010
1 comment:
Wonderful commentary and especially applicable to the family court bars across the country. Think what it would do for family court litigants if every one of their attorneys took this approach to each case.
Post a Comment