Mortgage Settlement:Sky Clearing or Storm Coming?

Whether CA and NY join is anticlimactic. The quibbling over the amount of the settlement was foolish. $17B or $25B has never been the issue. Of bigger concern is the ultimate trickle-down (how Reaganesque) to the affected homeowners.

The Banks have wanted a "free" pass as to future suits and an indemnification from suits by borrowers who are now out of house and home. I know that there will be the hue and cry of "they only got what they deserved; after all they didn't make their payments - so the paperwork was faulty - they didn't pay!" (I worked at a bank where a fellow SVP called it the "Human Cry" - never knew if it was a clever pun or...). Here, there is a human cry and it's from the families who fell behind for legitimate reasons (loss of job due to federal program cutbacks), tried to get a modification but before they could react their house was gone.

I have worked with nearly 100 variations of that scenario in the past 3 years! And I have handled 50+/- of the situation where the house got to be too expensive and the homeowner stopped paying because the mtge co refused payments after 90 or 120 days delinquent.

For that first group, where there were no assignments, where MERS (Mortgage Electronic Registration System) initially foreclosed, where HAMP was ignored or where a major Lender/Servicer stated to me "We don't have to do modifications because we did not take any Federal ("TARP") money", is the group that should be compensated. With the per household figure being $1,500, that's not even 1st, last and security for an apartment, and in many places barely 1st month's rent.

The Securitization of mortgages into RMBS (Residential Mortgage Backed Securities - where thousands of mortgages were pooled together - See Posting Dated ) made this fiasco possible. In a sense, the banks have had to deal with the losing cards they got in the draw. The suit should have included the rating agencies, the Investment Banks, and all who facilitated a swindle that makes Madoff look like a low level Ponzi scheme.

I cannot point a finger at any one individual, organization, regulator, administration etc and say "You caused this world recession!!" That being the case, the Banks that allowed forged or failed documents to be used, corrupted the Civil side of the legal system by swamping Plaintiffs' lawyers with Wall Street law firms to a point where, even though all procedures were followed the hired guns won.

I ran failed S&Ls in MD and part of the Bank of New England mess in MA - I have chased and caught the thieves and cut the business/person who just got a raw deal some slack. Here we have Corporate Persons, some of which took "assets" at the request or arm twisting of the Fed, Treasury, OCC, or FDIC, being asked to pay a quarter's earnings to make up for a systemic failure. That's the price for being in the game but here everyone has lost. Stockholders, displaced CEOs and other officers, Homeowners, Administration officials etc.

The $25B is just hush money - hush to the whole bloody mess.

Author's Copyright by Richard I Isacoff, Esq, February, 2012

www.isacofflaw.com

rii@isacofflaw.com

PS AN AGREEMENT WAS REACHED JUST AFTER I RELEASED THIS FOR 10AM FRIDAY. HERE IS A LINK TO THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT'S PRESS RELEASE http://tinyurl.com/73ypvub

Mortgage Mods - Where Did The Money Go?

My mortgage modification clients often ask about the class actions or Attorney Generals actions against mortgage companies, lenders, and servicers, when the newspapers/Internet proclaims "XYZ Bank settles with Massachusetts for $XXX Million". The biggest single question is "Where did the money go?" Unfortunately, the answer I give is "I don't know except that there was no fund set up for modifications". Then I get the BLANK STARES from my clients.

"How can that be?" they query, to which I reply, "I do not know - probably to offset the cost of the suit and to establish a new unit to investigate mortgage fraud AND to help balance the budget." To this date I have never received notification that the Commonwealth of MA is setting up a fund to help borrowers avoid foreclosures, or even to set up an agency to help homeowners apply for a loan modification.

At this juncture, homeowners are being cast adrift. The 50 States +/- CA & MA (depends on the day) have been arguing with the biggest lenders/servicers over a settlement for all of these institutions evil-doings; and they were indeed evil! The proposals are at $26Billion or $26,000,000,000 but no one is offering to pay. Instead the Banks et al want to promise they won't do it again and that they will make it easier for homeowners to get a modification. Making it more difficult would be to say "NO, WE WON'T DO MODS ANYMORE". No money will go to individual homeowners. No funds will be set up to help a borrower get caught up. As the title of the movie proclaimed "GONE IN 60 SECONDS" (so where is Nicholas Cage when we need him?).

Even if there is money made available, the selection/application process will be as difficult as getting the modification as evidenced by the recent Federal "EHLP" (Emergency Home Loan Program) program that only gave out 1/2 of the $1Billion allocated for it.

In fairness, because of the structure of the mortgages, now part of giant pools of loans called "Mortgage-Backed Securities" or "MBS" for short, no Bank owns the loan(s). They are collateral for a Bond, typically a fixed income security, pieces of which are bought and sold as part of mutual funds, retirement funds, and corporate investments. It's like GE borrowing money by issuing a bond - this means that GE is stating to the world that if it receives up to $XXXMillion from investors, GE will pay them interest at "X"% for "Y" years, and GE puts up its assets as collateral. With MBS, the underlying assets of the fund, home mortgages, are the collateral.

The refrain often heard when one is trying to get a modification is "The Investors do not allow modifications" or "This requested modification is outside investor guidelines". When the investor is the Federal Nation Mortgage Association (FannieMae) or the Federal Home Mortgage Corporation (FreddieMac) or the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) the formula used to determine "Yes" or "No" is at least obtainable. And, because these are either Government Agencies or quasi-government agencies, they do participate in the HAMP program. But, you deal not with Fannie or Freddie or the FHA but with the loan SERVICER. This is the company picked to run the pool of loans - to collect payments and send out bills, and to start foreclosures and to actually WORK ON MODIFICATIONS.

There is no rhyme or reason to the process. Each servicer has slightly different requirements, all allowed by the Making Home Affordable program which created HAMP. Paperwork must be submitted and often resubmitted again and again. This is the period that most borrowers give up or taking time from work to put documents together again and again, in the hope of getting an affordable payment now that there is no more overtime or even one less job for the borrower(s) to count-on for the money to meet the payments.

I often sit at my desk working on one project, while on hold different times with a servicer for an hour or sometimes two. I can keep working on my computer and have at least one other phone in use while I work with a servicer. So far, my results are good but my client has no money to pay for all of that time, even when I only count the time I am actually doing calculations and filling out forms or talking to a servicer's representative. Because, in addition, there are the hours spent with the client who has no money to pay for the time and the results.

The most frustrating part of this process is when I ask my client, "Okay, you are now 4 months behind because the payment went up. How much have you saved? Certainly if the payment was $700 per month and now it's $850, you have the $700 put aside for each of the four months the Bank returned your money!", and the client answers "Nothing - I paid other bills". At which point I ask "Well, how are you going to pay if you get a modification if you can't even save the money you had been paying?". Occasionally the client will say "I don't know". Most often I hear "Well, when I have the modification, I will be able to make the payments somehow". With trepidation I ask "How, if you can't make the payments now?".

This conversation takes place in my office or on my telephone at least twice every week and sometimes twice a day.

RULES FOR GETTING A MODIFICATION:

1. Call the Servicer and ask for modification or HAMP documents or go on their website and print them

2. Put all required documents together - fill them out completely and DATE THEM ALL and send them to the address stated on the website or the forms. Often they MUST be faxed.

3. Remember, if you are working with an attorney or any other third-party, that person/entity is going to have to have written permission from you to deal with the servicer/lender

4. Documents expire in 60 days. That means if you send in only some of the documents required, and then send in more, and then send in more because the servicer wants them, the first docs you submitted may be "stale dated" - just like bread - and need to be updated and resubmitted. This is where the process breaks down for most Homeowners.

5. Put aside the mortgage payment you were making or that you hope to be making. If you cannot save the money, you cannot save your home. Put simply, If a borrower is not disciplined enough to save the money to pay the mortgage, then there is no ability to pay the modified payment - so what is the point of going through all of the aggravation. Sometimes Life Is Not Fair.

6. If you get a package sent to you from the lender/servicer open it immediately. If documents are due on Wednesday of next week Make sure they get there by then. A day late and you are disqualified. Fair? Probably not but read the last sentence of Item 5 above.

The people with whom you will speak are not bad people. They are doing a job, trying to avoid losing their house and are jsut asking the questions they must to avoid being fired. Don't rant at them - that assures NO COOPERATION. Remember that the folks at the top of the MBS pyramid are the folks "calling the shots" and they can't lose.

Author's Copyright by Richard I Isacoff, Esq October 2011

rii@isacofflaw.com

http://www.isacofflaw.com

Housing for the Homeless, Inc. (in organization)

The other day, I responded to a comment on Twitter from a knowledgeable mortgage financing friend regarding the current housing situation vis a vis foreclosures. His view is that the "market should find its own level" ; that the Federal Government should not interfere with modification programs, the EHLP program etc.

After some thought, I must agree with him. If the pace of foreclosures returns to normal (once the robo-whatever is done and docs are corrected) and evictions follow promptly, there will be plenty of Housing For The Homeless. There will be no need to build new shelters. Mortgagees can just allow cities to house "The Homeless" in these abandoned/emptied OREO properties. The cities would pay but only by not taxing the mortgagee/foreclosing entity. If the mortgagee does not incur this liability by recording a deed, then more properties will be formally owned by the entity which won the foreclosure sale bid.

Now, one might ask,"Why should the homeless get to live in someone else's house when the someone else just got evicted and became HOMELESS?" Answer: "Well, that's the market finding its level!!!". Further, the new homeless family can move into another "victim's" house as he/they get thrown out! See, that way no one can complain - except "The Investors".

This is the shadowy group (Goldman, Lehman, Bear Stearns, Countrywide, JPMorgan et al) which created the securitizations of the mortgages, and sold and/or bought (and hedged) the resulting "bonds". They are the folks who took a mortgage, put it together with 3000 others, released all of the originating banks/mortgage companies from all liability, and sold pieces of the pool of mortgages as "Mortgage-Backed Security" shares/participations.

A solution to the matter of getting the investors paid during the OREO stage, would be to have the "Newly Homeless" receive a minimum wage pay (because they are out of work which is why they lost the house to start with) to remove all of the black mold that develops in uninhabited housing. To be fair, some of it isn't Black Mold of the bad kind but just regular garden variety MOLD.

So we have the solution:
1. Increase the pace of foreclosures to create Housing for the Homeless
2. Hire the homeless, now in a home, to remove mold
3. This helps the national unemployment problem so there should be some federal money for job creation, which can be paid to the investors as rent from the Homeless
4. The homeless move in, shopping carts, kids and all, and the streets look better, so new companies will move into the formerly empty urban areas because the former homeless have homes and a paycheck
5. The suits against the foreclosing mortgagees should slow, because, the family which just got evicted can move into another family's newly vacant home AND get paid.

The market will find its level. Hopefully it will be above the water table.

Author's Copyright by Richard I. Isacoff, Esq, July, 2011

rii@isacofflaw.com
http://www.isacofflaw.com

Foreclosures Down? Not Really!

RealtyTrac, the company that tracks foreclosures (state by state) and gives national figures, reports that foreclosures, meaning homeowners getting a foreclosure notice, is at a 26 month low - ONLY 225,101, down nearly 14% (http://www.realtytrac.com/home/).
Reading and digesting the information further one discovers that the reduction is not due to fewer defaults by borrowers, or lenders/servicers having less work , but rather it is due to IMPROPER FORECLOSURE PROCEDURES.

For months it has been known that some of the largest servicers have been using so-called "robo-signers", unauthorized personnel signing assignments of mortgages and notes, and foreclosure documents. Also, as the suit by States' AGs shows, in their 27 page report, what has to be done to fix the problem. While the servicers have rebelled and are using all tools available to stop regulations, even BofA, the biggest, has made modest changes - like giving returning service members modifications and even PRINCIPAL REDUCTIONS.

The battle is getting so fierce that Sen. Richard Shelby (R), the senior Republican on the Senate Banking Committee has said that the report is a "regulatory shakedown" being conducted to "advance the administration's political agenda" (American Banker 3/9/11 )

Taking the battle over the "mortgage crisis" even further is a letter, being circulated by House Republicans to Treas. Sec'y Timothy Geithner, that calls into questions most of the report's/settlement proposal's recommendations (http://tinyurl.com/4byflk4).

So what is the "TRUTH"? Is the rate of foreclosures falling? Yes, in so far as the "foreclosers" have had to stop or be sued by all 50 states (again) and won't start again in earnerst until they get the paperwork and process straightened out. But, the rate of defaults and the "right to foreclose" have continued to climb. If RealtyTrac counted all of the refilings for corrected documentation, there would have been an increase of 30%!

The future looks bright for auctioneers, dim for homeowners with the current climate.

(Follow the link to RealtyTrac's 3 minute video report on foreclosure activity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqsyJNy9ppI

Author's Copyright by Richard I. Isacoff, Esq, March 2011
rii@isacofflaw.com
http://www.isacofflaw.com/

Record 2.9 million Foreclosures; Investors Want Money

There were two "complimentary" articles yesterday - one in American Banker, entitled "MBS Trustees Push JPMorgan Chase for Access to Loan Files", the other from RealtyTrac's Agent Advocate newsletter announcing, "Record 2.9 million U.S. Properties Receive Foreclosure Filings in 2010...". It seems that the Trustees of the Mortgage-Backed Securities ("MBS") are demanding loan files from servicers, looking for bad underwriting, false documents, missing documents, but most importantly trying to force the MBS servicers/originators to "repurchase" or "buy-back" bad loans in the varying securitization pools that comprise the MBS.

It is all too common at this time to see a mortgage loan owned by "Deutsche Bank as Trustee for the ABC Mortgage Funding Trust Series 2005-34", with the loan serviced by some other company, like Saxon, or OCWEN, or AHMSI (America Home Mortgage Sevicing Inc), or JPMorgan Chase or....

What does this mean? Maybe the right to get a loan modification!!! The details are a bit confusing, but bear with me please.

Jeff Horwitz in his article in the American Banker states "They've (the Trustees) been called "braindead", "negligent", and "otiose"" (this rather obscure word simply means ineffective, worthless, or superfluous). He goes on however to state that it might be the Trustees which have the ability to force Servicers to repurchase the bad loans.

In an unusual legal twist, because of Washington Mutual Bank's ("WAMU") insolvency and momentary receivership (federal control during paper signing), Deutsche Bank as the Trustee, assumed the responsibilities of the Servicer, WAMU, which had breached the 30o+ page contract, detailing who does what and how much everyone is paid. The agreement is called the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement" or "PSA". In another case, Wells Fargo has sued EMC Mortgage, another servicer, for failing to turnover documents.

For homeowners, with a mortgage from WAMU or where they serviced a loan which was part of an MBS, this may give them a party to sue to get a loan modification. In short, the Making Home Affordable Program and HAMP do not give mortgagors/homeowners a right to sue. Now however, with Deutsche Bank taking the dual role of Trustee and Servicer and getting all of the responsibilities that goes along with both positions, it is quite possible that Courts will recognize the borrowers right to sue under what is called a "Third-Party Beneficiary" theory.

This theory states that if two parties make a contract to benefit a third party, that third party has a right to sue to enforce the contract, even though the third party did not sign the contract. Here, while HAMP may not give that status to homeowners, it does allow the parties to sue each other. When one of the parties to the contract takes on multiple roles, the protections that each party has may disappear. Basically, you cannot indemnify yourself or get insurance for your own actions.

Perhaps, even more direct would be the right to sue Deutsche Bank, in its capacity as Trustee and Servicer, under the premise that it now, due to its servicing role and assumption of liabilities, has a duty to the borrower, that it is acting for the Investors and the Borrowers.

The other article, from RealtyTrac which tracks foreclosures throughout the country, discusses the record number of foreclosures; 2.9 million!! Many of these foreclosure filings could have been avoided if modifications were granted. Remember, individual homeowners have not had a right to sue to enforce the HAMP modification program, and HSBC/Household/Beneficial does not participate at all. Just think about the situation if 15% of the 2.9 million foreclosures were modified loans instead - that would have been 435,000 non-foreclosures (almost 2 months worth of filings).

Hopefully, the information above is understandable and of use. Please contact us if you have questions -e-mail is best.

Author's Copyright by Richard I. Isacoff, Esq, February 2011

rii@isacofflaw.com

http://www.isacofflaw.com/

The Greatest Depression? Ask Rep. Neugebauer (R-TX)

Rep Randy Neugebauer, Chairman, House Financial Services Oversight Subcommittee, said it is time for the government to admit its foreclosure prevention efforts are a failure and should be shut down. The Texas Republican said such programs are counterproductive and are preventing the housing market from bottoming out, which is necessary before recovery can begin. (1/24/2011 from the American Banker)

Now, there is a real solution to the foreclosure crisis! Bite the bullet - displace hundreds of thousands of homeowners, let the inventory of bank-owned properties (OREO) sky-rocket, let the housing market drop bottomless and that will allow us to have an economic recovery. The sad part about Rep. Neugebauer's assertion is that he may be right in the long-term, but at what IMMEDIATE & CURRENT COST!

The program is not working - no news there. Why? Because the government regulators and policy makers do not want to to tackle the "investment banks" and the "investors" in mortgage-backed securities ("MBS")to tell them they WILL modify loans. At this time, no one can order a lender, mortgage servicer, investor, Pool Trustee, or any one else that it/she/he MUST modify a loan.

Everything is voluntary and the decision makers are in a position that they cannot lose. even if the market "bottoms out" as the Rep. from TX suggests it should. The Sponsors of the MBSs and the investment banks that put the packages together and sold them have already been paid or are so high up the MBS hierarchy of payees, that unless the value of every mortgage in the pool of mortgages becomes utterly worthless (no value at all to the houses securing the mortgages which comprise the MBS), THEY WILL GET PAID.

From an "economic" point of view (see the 1/13/11 posting), the Rep. makes sense. From a financial point of view it does not. From a human point of view it would be "The Nightmare from Wall Street". Remember "economics" is the study of an economy which is merely a system to deal with supply and demand. The concepts are simple but the implications are not. This is a case where the theory is great and accurate in its long-term view. But, getting from here (where/when we need modifications and for the Government to help all of us struggle through the mess) to there (where the market, the economy can correct itself) is a 20 year span.

Perhaps the Rep. has not taken into account the mass disruption of the pensions which hold funds that hold mortgage-backed securities. Or maybe he has forgotten that if there is no confidence in the value of the MBS, which is really set by its stability and ability to pay the return it's promised, the value will drop to $0 or something close to it. In reality, the houses that would be lost in foreclosure will retain significant value, even if that is only 20% or 30% of the mortgage balance. When the next generation comes along, it will be able to buy a vacant house for 40 cents on the dollar from what was owed on the mortgage. What will it cost the current homeowners on a nationwide basis?

Factor in those who lose houses to foreclosure and then the rest of the homeowners, from low-income to upper-middle class income, who manage to keep a house now worth half (1/2) of what's owed, and you have a "financial" (not economic") crisis. The economy will have way to much supply, and literally no demand for years.

Recession? Nah, the Greatest Depression

Author's Copyright by Richard I. Isacoff, Esq, January, 2011

rii@isacofflaw.com

http://www.isacofflaw.com/

HAMP: "You Probably Think This LAW Is About YOU!"

This posting's title, with apologies to Carly Simon who wrote and sung Billboard's 72nd most popular song ever, is appropriate if any of us think that the Mortgage Modification issues and Programs, like HAMP, are about us; they are all about the Servicers/Lenders and the INVESTORS of the ubiquitous Mortgage-Backed Securities ("MBS").

The program, which has no teeth for enforcement by any entity (Treasury, FDIC, Federal Reserve, etc.) was established to protect the INVESTMENT pools of securitized mortgages. This means simply that the mortgage and investment communities refused to permit any government force-down of a program that might hurt "ROI" or "Return on Investment", or more crudely put, the PROFITS and INCOME made by the owners of these mortgage pools, and by the Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers of the world - the people who brought us the "great meltdown"

In fairness, the whole idea behind putting a large number of mortgages together, computing the average interest rate to be paid by homeowners, while at the same time calculating the expected or historical number of "bad" (non-paying) loans, was to enlarge the market of home ownership. By putting the mortgages into securities, all of the mortgage originators, brokers, lenders, banks, mortgage companies, who made these mortgage loans were "off the hook".

As stated in earlier posts, only the investors had anything to lose and they had done their homework. They figured out how much to pay for $1 billion of what became a BOND secured by home mortgages. What could be safer? Based on past experience, the Depression aside, the answer was Nothing Could Be Safer! Or maybe not!!!

During the early musings about what to do as the market was plummeting, and Mortgage-Backed Securities were being valued at $0 - high figures of 40% of face value, there were many theories put forth as to "What Do We Do Now?". One of those concepts was to have Congress and the Supreme Court declare that the contract making up these pools of mortgages, could be broken, for the sake of national security. Remember, our financial stability was gone and the markets were in free-fall.

Rejecting that idea, and rather than one of the Federal Government's arms publicly insuring that no MBS would drop below 70% of face value because the Federal Government would guaranty the FIRST 30% of losses which would have stopped the spiral down, the free-market system functioned as it is designed to do, and we ended up with the mess we are in currently regarding FORECLOSURES!!

The Making Home Affordable ("MHA") program which gave birth to "HAMP" really was a deal with the mortgage and securities industries. The program is about making sure that profits stay high enough to continue to attract buyers of MBS. The way to accomplish that goal is to NOT make modifications that will hurt the INVESTOR - Homeowners be damned. 9%-10% unemployment is no excuse for defaulting on your mortgage payment. If you can catch up fast enough you get to keep your house. If not, well, the house goes to sale at auction -but you can't bid -HA! Gotcha!

Realize that the reason the rules do not help most of the homeowners applying for modifications, or foolishly, a principal write-down, is that they are not supposed to. The rules are there, as written, to protect investors. Well, YES and NO!. If the investors take significant losses, the spiral down starts again and soon a family homestead will consist of two large tents.

Author's Copyright by Richard I. Isacoff, Esq

http://www.isacofflaw.com/

rii@isacofflaw.com

Judicial or Non-Judicial Foreclosure: Do I Keep My House!

All of the news of late has been about the so-called "robo-signers" at mortgage companies dealing in 23 "judicial foreclosure states", and the impact that an unknown number of potentially improper foreclosures will have on our already troubled real estate and financial markets.

But, what exactly is the difference between those 23 "judicial foreclosure states" and the rest of the states?

In a so-called "judicial foreclosure state", before a lender can foreclose on a house, it must get approval from the court – whichever one is responsible for hearing Complaints/Suits to Foreclose in the particular state. In Massachusetts, the court would be either the Land Court, which deals exclusively with real estate issues, or the Superior Court. However, Massachusetts is not one of the 23 states mentioned above.

In a judicial foreclosure state, homeowners have the right to go to court and challenge the foreclosure – to have "their day in court." There are many grounds upon which a foreclosure can be challenged: that the bill has since been paid, that there is a discrepancy between the owner's records of payments and the mortgage company’s, or that notice of the request was never received (except if you are already in court, that’s a hard argument to make). The point is that you get a chance to plead your case to a judge before the foreclosure process can commence.

In a state like the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, if you are in default of the mortgage note terms and owe money to the lender/servicer, a number of steps need to be followed as set out in the Massachusetts General Laws. But there is no mandate that the foreclosing party go to court first. In fact, the law specifically does not require any court action. That was the purpose of what is called a "Statutory Power of Sale" – the lender gets rights from the contracts you sign (mortgage and mortgage note) and the General Laws of Massachusetts.

The problem that is being discussed in the "judicial foreclosure states" is that employees with authority to sign foreclosure documents were doing so stating that they had reviewed all of the required files to begin a foreclosure. But, in actuality, they never did the analysis of those files. They simply signed that they did the review, and the courts were relying on the affidavits of these persons. In those cases, the court has a reason to stop a foreclosure or reverse one that happened (in some instances) if, upon examination, the foreclosure documents are not correct or complete.

For example, if there is a claim that the foreclosing party has ownership of the mortgage note and the mortgage, based on an assignment from one bank to another, but there is no such assignment in the file, then the foreclosing bank/lender may not have the right to do so. There may, in fact, have been an assignment, but if it is not on the record, or at least in the possession of the foreclosing bank/lender, the sale is probably no good.

What is the difference, then, in a non-judicial foreclosure state? NOTHING! The foreclosing bank/lender still must have the same documents showing ownership of the loan, and they must provide the same required notice(s) to a borrower, giving them a chance to pay the loan current and avoid a foreclosure.

As a safeguard in Massachusetts, for example, a lender has to give a minimum of 90 days Notice To Cure a Default, and in some circumstances 150 days. No foreclosure process can take place during that time. After and only after that period can a lender/servicer start to foreclose.

In reality – for purposes of "bad documents," affidavits that are false or meaningless, certifications of ownership and amounts owed that are never reviewed, and most of the other steps of the process – there is no difference in terms of judicial vs. non-judicial foreclosure states.

In essence, we are not dealing with a problem with documents for a court. We are dealing with the equivalent of falsified attestations — in legal terms, perjury or what is called "giving false oath." Or, in simpler terms, lying.

Author's Copyright by Richard I. Isacoff, Esq, October 2010

http://www.isacofflaw.com/

New Homeowner Protection - Neighborhood Stabilization Act

The new Neighborhood Stabilization Act, which was enacted with an Emergency Preamble, became effective, in part, upon signing by Governor Duval Patrick on Thursday, July 29, 2010. The new law gives meaningful additional protections to Homeowners facing foreclosure, and tenants living in houses that have gone to foreclosure sale. We will deal with the Ownership issues in this post and the Tenant issue in the next.)

In order to foreclose on a property in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts a mortgagee/creditor MUST give the homeowner/mortgagor a 150 day Notice To Cure the default giving rise to the foreclosure threat. This "Cure Period" is subject to the following rules:

1. If the lender/servicer certifies that is has "engaged in a good faith effort to negotiate a commercially reasonable alternative to foreclosure..." (defined below) and

2. If this effort "has involved at least one meeting either in person or by telephone, between a creditor's representative and the borrower or borrower's attorney or the borrower's representative..." and

3. "After such meeting the creditor and the borrower were not successful in resolving their dispute, then the creditor may begin foreclosure proceedings after a right to cure period lasting 90 days..."

4. If the borrower does not respond to mail offering to negotiate within 30 days (does not state when the 30 days starts) then the borrower must live with the 90 day period allowed the creditor instead of the 150 days

KEY DEFINITION

"Creditor has made a good faith effort to negotiate and agree upon a commercially reasonable alternative to foreclosure shall mean that the creditor has considered"

a. "an assessment of borrower's current circumstances including without limitation (they can consider more, not less) income, debts, and obligations"

b. "the net present value ("NPV") of receiving payments pursuant to a modified mortgage loan as compared to the net recovery following foreclosure" -(this is a calculation taking into account the following factors to arrive at a value to compare to the value of the modified loan)

1. the current market value
2. the costs of foreclosure
3. foreclosure stigma discount to re-sell the house
4. the total unpaid balance
5. number of months expected before sale
6. taxes and insurance costs
7. the appreciation/depreciation forecast.

The creditor must use the Mass Housing Finance Agency formula, FDIC formula, or Treasury formula.

c. "...The creditor shall provide by first class mail and certified mail or private carrier to the borrower documentation of the good faith effort 10 days prior to meeting, telephone conversation specified..." (in paragraph 2. above)

The importance of this law cannot be overstated. While it grants an extra 60 days to the borrower, sixty days which did not exist until the Commonwealth passed an earlier law in 2009, it REQUIRES the creditor to assess the situation OR wait 150 days to BEGIN a foreclosure process. It is as far as the Commonwealth can go to try to force a creditor / mortgagee to negotiate a modification.

The notice that has to be given to the borrower/mortgagor before the creditor can start the foreclosure process, whether it is a 90 day notice or a notice after the 150 days, MUST contain the following information

1. Nature of the default and the amount of money needed to cure/fix the default
2. The date by which the default must be cured (stating "150 days after the date of this letter" or "90 days after the date of this letter" is not good enough. The creditor must give an actual DATE)
3. That is the borrower/mortgagor does not cure the default (pay the back amount owed) the creditor can take steps to foreclose on the house
4. The name and address of the creditor and the telephone number of a representative whom the borrower/mortgagor can contact if the borrower/mortgagor disagrees with the statements in the notice
5. Name of current and former mortgage broker or mortgage loan originator for the mortgage
6. Statement that the mortgagor/borrower may be eligible for help with the names and telephone number of the agencies
7. That the creditor may sell the property to pay off the mortgage
8. That the borrower/mortgagor may redeem the property anytime PRIOR to the sale by paying all amounts due
9. That the borrower/mortgagor may be evicted after the sale (this does not mean 5 minutes after the sale but after proper eviction proceedings in the Court)

NO PROPER NOTICE, NO FORECLOSURE

The Act gets technical - do not try to navigate it yourself. If you are behind and you receive a Notice to Cure, and you cannot PAY ALL ARREARS, contact a lawyer or Housing Agency immediately
Author's Copyright by Richard I. Isacoff, Esq, August 2010

rii@isacofflaw.com
http://www.isacofflaw.com

Massachusetts Passes Homeowner Relief Bill

Yesterday, the Massachusetts legislature passed and Governor Duval Patrick (D) signed a bill that will grant additional safeguards to homeowners facing foreclosures.

In short, Lenders/servicers/anyone trying to foreclose on a 1-4 family residence will have to give the homeowner a 150 day notice that there is a default and that if it is not cured/paid within 150 days from the date of the notice, the foreclosing party will have the right to start a foreclosure proceeding.

The bill also makes lenders offer a modification or other workout plan unless a formula shows that to do so will net the foreclosing party less than a foreclosure sale (net present value test).

A full analysis will appear on Monday August 2, 1010

Author's Copyright by Richard I. Isacoff, Esq. July, 2010

rii@isacofflaw.com

http://www.isacofflaw.com/

The Sale is Over - My House is Gone!

The first step in reversing a foreclosure is to prevent it in the first place. Makes no sense but it is true. Very few people (almost none) lose a house to foreclosure without knowing it is going to happen. This is true in a state like Massachusetts which does not require a Court hearing before a foreclosure sale, or one like Connecticut where there is a Court required mediation before any sale can take place. The first clue that there might be a foreclosure sale is that the homeowner HAS NOT PAID HIS/HER MORTGAGE FOR A NUMBER OF MONTHS!

Hire a lawyer and if you do not know who to call, call the State Bar Association. Or go to or call a Housing Agency or go to a Court and ask someone in the Clerk's Office what to do, especially if there is a Housing Court where you live. Do whatever you can (legally) to stop the sale.

Okay, the sale takes place and the Lender buys back the house. What now? How have I managed to reverse a sale or actually 4 or 5 of them (one pending now)? The secret, which really is just good lawyering, is to understand the process; from the time a loan application is completed - the origination process, closing, recording of the documents, servicing (sending bills and collecting monthly mortgage payments), all of the steps in the actual foreclosure process, and, critically, WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THE SALE!!

In almost all States, there is a short period after a sale takes place for the homeowner and borrower to contest the validity of the sale. It may involve going to a Court, or registering the opposition at the place recording the Land Records or filing a grievance with a special Board; but there is a way to contest the proceeding. This step is important because it stops the process in its tracks. Stop the Foreclosure Deed from being put on record. Remember the purpose of the sale is for the Lender to get money - that is why it is called a foreclosure SALE. It get incredibly more difficult to reverse the sale if there is a second transfer to another buyer.

Do not forget that the lender which has your mortgage ordered the sale. Call them as soon as possible after the sale. You may have to wait on hold for an hour but so what! It's your home. Get to the foreclosure department at the lender, which may take another hour, but again, so what! You may be referred to the law firm or auctioneer which held the sale -call it. Do not give up until there is no one left to call. Make detailed notes of every number you called or department to which you were transferred, the name of the person(s) to whom you spoke, the length of the call, the length of the conversation, the CONTENT of your conversation, and anything else you think might be important.

The legal work really comes down to a few issues:

1. Was the sale conducted in strict accordance with the State statute - there are no federal laws?
2. Was the sale and the property properly advertised? (this is part of state procedure)
3. Were all of the steps required after the sale followed by the Lender and the "Buyer"?
4. Can you get to a Court and file a suit to prevent the deed from being recorded while things get sorted out?
5. Were you in the middle of a modification program, especially one under the Making Home Affordable program (HAMP modification), the so-called Obama Plan? If so contact the Lender IMMEDIATELY, and call a lawyer or housing agency.
6. Even though you were behind, can you make any payments to show good faith - family/friends who didn't realize the seriousness of the problem?
7. If you had previously spoken to a bankruptcy attorney CALL HIM/HER IMMEDIATELY.
8. Is the loan one owned by FannieMae or FreddieMac? If so, there is a good chance you can get the foreclosure fixed, rather undone.

There are another dozen legalities and related matters that should be examined, but the ones above will be the most critical right after the sale.

Author's Copyright by Richard I. Isacoff, Esq., May 2010

rii@isacofflaw.com
http://www.isacofflaw.com/

FORECLOSURES 1 - MODIFICATIONS 0

There is no way to maintain this BLOG as frequently as would be liked because FORECLOSURES ARE NOT DECREASING! We are saving at least one (1) house a week and for a small office that is a huge investment of time.

If you have your home sold at a foreclosure sale and you have not taken all possible steps to stop the sale, shame on you. If you never knew what options were available, shame on the attorneys and the mortgage industry. Keep in mind that a MORTGAGE SERVICER would rather foreclose than modify despite HAMP. The why is simple!

Servicers are paid a fee to handle the payments and billing on a monthly basis, of all loans in the portfolio. If a percentage of those loans get delinquent enough to warrant legal action the servicer wants no part of the process. They are paid for collecting money and sending bills, and referring mortgages to legal firms for foreclosure. THEY ARE NOT PAID FOR MODIFICATIONS! Yes, there is a provision in the Making Home Affordable package that theoretically pays $1,500 to a servicer for each modification, but that only applies to FannieMae and FreddieMac loans.

MOST IMPORTANT, A SERVICER LOSES NOTHING IF A HOUSE IS FORECLOSED AT A HUGE LOSS. The owner of the loan losses but the Servicer does not care. It gets paid for servicing the loan and gets paid for taking it to foreclosure. For example,there is no loss TO THE SERVICER because the loan was for $200,000 and the foreclosure sale resulted in the mortgagee (lender) buying the house back and then selling it for $100,000. No one has any risk of loss except the HOMEOWNER

So, we are left with the problem of a company spending money (salaries) to try to work on a modification by contacting the owner(s) of the loan and asking for permission and not getting paid for the work. Now, most servicing agreements (the contract between the owner of the loan, or the Trustee of the Mortgage Backed Security that actually owns the loan) grant a certain amount of leeway for the servicing company (A.S.C., AHMSI (old Option One), Ocwen, HomeEq, CitiMortgage etc, Chase Mortgage etc., ETC.). This flexibility is very limited. What is not limited is foreclosing, and each foreclosure gets money to the servicer for finalizing the loan.

If this all reads like "Lost in the Fun House" or "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" or the housing equivalent of FEMA during Katrina in Louisiana, that is because it is counter-intuitive and counter-productive, and costly. The monetary costs can be calculated and written-off as a "cost of doing business". The Servicer or owner of the loan, the Mortgage Backed Security or the Bank, may even receive money from the bail-out programs for foreclosing and "taking a loss"

The good news - It is possible, sometimes, to reverse a foreclosure. I know this because I have done FIVE (5). There are no tricks, no easy ways to do it, and no lender will want to cooperate AT FIRST. Details in the next installment

Author's Copyright by Richard I. Isacoff, Esq, April, 2010

rii@isacofflaw.com
http://www.isacofflaw.com/

The Recession:It Has An End (We Hope)

I recently saw a billboard that read " THE RECESSION: IT HAS AND END". Tell that to the people who have been irreparably damaged by the economic collapse we have just been through and the slow recovery we are in now.

The recession and the increase in foreclosures has actually aided one sector of business. If you watch cable television, especially after 8pm almost any evening you will instantly recognize the verbal headline "STOP FORECLOSURE NOW!" or one of my other favorites "IF YOU OWE AT LEAST $10,000 IN CREDIT CARD DEBT WE CAN HELP WITHOUT BANKRUPTCY". The telephone number to call is the same "CALL 1-800-WE SCAM U"

Jaundiced, cynical view? Just a hard cold look at an industry that preys off of peoples’ misery in these very difficult times. While the pace of NEW consumer credit debt has slowed, it is more because of the fact that card issuers have increased rates to 30% (just before the Feb. 22, 2010 deadline) or because they have cut back credit lines so that there is virtually no available credit on many card-holders cards - they have been MAXED OUT (Read James Scurlock’s book of that name or get the DVD of this award winning documentary on consumer credit in the US)

The Mortgage rescue scam companies are out there in force promising to save your house provided you pay them anywhere from $1,500 to $7,500 up front for their services. The most that nearly all of them can do is to direct you to complete documents for participation in the President’s "MAKING HOME AFFORDABLE" program.

From experience, most lenders, while they do not want to take houses, do not want to have a mortgage loan on the books that is not paying the monthly installment. It is inconceivable that there are these super companies out there in TV world which can work miracles and force a mortgage lender or a mortgage servicer to take less than it is owed. Some will have your mortgage documents audited - reviewed for any irregularities or violations of the laws that govern consumer lending and specifically mortgage transactions. Others will just keep stalling, using your money until the house is foreclosed on, or right until the week before a foreclosure sale and then return some portion to you. They will blame the lenders - You will not have a home!

On the credit card side, there is at least one company that is offering assistance with credit card debt as "...authorized by the President's Stimulus Plan". The Treasury Department’s, FDIC’s TARP’S, the Federal Reserve’s plan all allow debt reduction. BUT, such plans were always allowed. . The promise that for a "reasonable fee" a company can force a creditor to take 50% is absurd. It is especially harmful to those who stop making regular payments because of the promised salvation described in the 60 second "magic pill"commercial

Quick tips :

1. There is no secret to reducing the debt (see earlier posts). If it is a mortgage, you need an attorney or someone from one of the government sponsored programs to help you through the maze of paperwork.

2. Credit Card debt? - Most companies will not even talk to you about a compromise settlement until you are 90 days late. By then, if the company will not accept the "settlement offer" you are so far behind that you will never be able to catch up. There are a few like Consumer Credit Counseling Services of Southern New England (or your location) which will try to negotiate reduced interest rates to lower your payments BEFORE you get too far behind. They change a nominal monthly fees but no up front fee for their service.

3. If you are in danger of losing your home, or of losing your sanity, contact an attorney who works in these fields. You should get objective and non-leading advice. If a bankruptcy is the only way to protect your house, you will be so informed. If you cannot make even minimum monthly payments on your credit cards, a brief consultation, normally free, with an attorney will point that out to you. On the other hand, if there is another way around the problems, a knowledgeable and ethical attorney will be able to show you the way.

In summary - do not fall for the "1 800 we save u" companies. If they were that good, the TV advertising wouldn't be necessary and the Treasury Department would hire them to straighten out the federal budget

Author's Copyright by Richard I Isacoff, Esq, March 2010

http://www.isacofflaw.com/

rii@isacofflaw.com

Foreclosures, Jobs, Bank Mergers, & What Retirement ?

As we approach the end of the year there are a number if issues we should keep in mind. All are important but at differing levels depending on our own circumstances

1. The Foreclosure Crisis is far from over. There are currently approximately 3.5 million homes in some stage of foreclosure. It is projected that 2010 will see another 3 million enter foreclosure (that's 6.5 million without any further economic deterioration). Keep in mind that this does not include mortgages in default, by even as much as 90 days, that have not been moved to the "F" status by the lender.

The Making Home Affordable Program ("MHA") is broken, probably beyond repair. Very few (less than 1% of the loans in the Trial Modification period) have made it to a permanent modification. Lenders are blaming borrowers for not sending in documents timely or for not making payments within the successive 30 day periods. True, the are a certain number of borrowers who will not be able to keep their homes because they could never have afforded it, or have had a life altering experience from which they cannot recover.

BUT, I have had to submit documents for 40% of my clients, for whom I am working the MHA program, 2, 3, and even 4 times; and sometimes Borrowers are promised coupons for payments, never get them, make a payment late and are disqualified from the program - this again from my personal experience as an attorney with knowledge of the MHA program, bankruptcy, mortgages, real estate conveyancing, finance and financial planning, money management, banking and economics.

2. Un-Employment and Under-Employment exceeds 14%. Add to that sobering figure the numbers of jobless who no longer have unemployment benefits and who have given up registering for jobs at the local State Agency, and we move to the 18%-20% range or 1 in 5 or 6 people in the eligible labor force. This does not help the foreclosure problem - it's hard to pay for your house with no job, or with receiving a cut in hours by 25%, or by getting a "new" job paying $11/hour instead of the $18/hr in the job just lost.

Un/under-employment doesn't help consumer spending either. People are spending less, especially for true discretionary items, like the new car, new television, new washing machine, extra pair of shoes, and eating out. That is bad for business profits which is bad for job creation or just job market stability. And it is not just the big stores that are suffering; in fact, they can weather the storm better than the mom and pop stores and small businesses nationwide. All of this leads to a further erosion in jobs and then another round of foreclosures, and then another bank failure and on and on.

3. In a mere 15 months there has been such a massive consolidation in the Banking and Finance sectors that 3 years ago the Justice Department would have been bringing anti-trust actions daily (yes, that is hyperbole but barely). How has this hurt? Try to get a loan from any non-local bank, especially if you have average credit individually or are a small business with no access to equity markets (selling stock for example) or public debt offerings (like corporate bonds).

So now we have businesses, under the gun because of a downturn in business which is caused by un/under-employment, which cannot get money to stay in business waiting for the economy to turn positive - thus another business failure. Or we have an individual who cannot convince his/her lender to modify a loan or refinance it (no cash out at closing, just a lower interest rate) because the bank finds the Borrower's credit does not meet the lender's NEW credit criteria.
Guess what? Another foreclosure! Oh, and by the way, each foreclosure tends to lower the values of homes around the foreclosed property, so equity evaporates making it impossible for the under-employed with an above-average but not stellar credit score to refinance because the loan-to-value ratio (amount of loan divided into the value of the house) is too high (greater then 70-80%).

4. The "golden years" of retirement? They may be gone for an entire generation who had investments in 401k plans, IRAs, and the stock market generally. Sure the markets are up in the sense that the Dow, NASDAQ, and S&P indices are up from their lows, but have average people recovered their losses. Basically NO! When we hear "The stock market is up 24% from a year ago" (still 30+% below where it was before the crash) that means that the securities traders are making money and some large corporations are as well. Sure, some individuals' portfolios have gained back part of the loss but recovered? NO! And we still do not know about Social Security, or health care, or ....

Further, as discussed on NPR's show "Marketplace Money" this morning by Knight Kiplinger, editor-in-chief of one of the most respected financial publications, there is a new reality: People cannot depend on the equity in their homes for part of their retirement funding. His comments went on to state that "... now housing has returned to its rightful place, as a place you live. It is shelter; it is not an investment".

This is a major change in approach from what had been a belief held for decades by homeowners, and was part of the advice given by investment counselors/financial planners to their customers/clients. It went something like this: "With the yearly appreciation on your house being 5%, in 14 1/2 years the value will have doubled and the mortgage will be paid down by one-half, so you'll have plenty of equity when you sell to buy that nice condo by the beach".

Now we cannot plan to use the house we live in for retirement money - after 25 years and 5 refinances, but never beyond 80% of the house's value, we will be lucky to have the funds to pay off the then existing mortgage and have a few dollars left for? Certainly not the condo on the beach. Is that what has happened in the housing market and if so, what is being done to stop the further erosion of value, goes down every time there is a foreclosure in the area of your home.

We go back to the Mortgage meltdown, the continuing high un/under- employment, the rampant crimes committed by Wall Street mortgage securitizers, and our own use of our homes as the means to get money for vacations, a new car, a new porch or pool etc. When you get a Home Equity Line Of Credit ("HELOC") and it comes with a debit card to make using the credit line easier, we should have known something was not right. Paying for a cup of coffee with your house's equity? Maybe not that bad but...

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

More crucial is our attitude, the way we all believe this will turn out. There is growing despair among those hit hardest - those who have lost jobs and those who are losing homes. EMPLOYMENT is perhaps the biggest obstacle to overcome. If people are gainfully employed they can begin to recapture their lives. Then and only then there is the potential to save the home, or not worry about whether the heating bill should be paid or the electric bill; and the car payment?

After a sign that the job scene is getting better, people NEED to see and believe that the government is taking real steps to stop foreclosures. Earlier posts have discussed some of the ways the loans which have become securitized can be modified. That said, our current financial services (banking, brokerage, insurance) regulators like FDIC, Federal Reserve, Treasury Department must take action to force the lenders to modify those loans that already qualify for the MHA program. Lost documents, unreasonable deadlines given to borrowers, no clear instructions on where to send payments, an endless loop of telephone prompts without human intervention for 30-45 minutes, all have to stop.

Maybe the outcome of the foreclosures will be to create jobs with the companies that service the loans, inspect the properties, go to Court to evict you, and clean up the property to get the house ready for sale.

Prognosis? the patient, us, will live but what will be the quality of life?

Author's Copyright by Richard I. Isacoff, Esq, December 2009

http://www.isacofflaw.com/
rii@isacofflaw.com

How Many Clients Does it Take....

"How Many Clients Does It Take To Change A Light Bulb?" is the name of a small but funny (to a lawyer anyway) book by a fellow attorney from the other end of Massachusetts. Val (actually Giovanni) Diviacchi has written this short but all to true statement, not just about clients, but about all of us in reality. The Answer? One! He/she holds the light bulb and expects the world to revolve around him/her!

Looking at the growing number of foreclosures and the ever-increasing unemployment, we do not have the luxury of waiting for the world, the state, the Feds etc., to help us. As was reported in the New York Times last week by Peter S. Goodman, the modification programs, including the so-called Obama Plan, the Making Home Affordable program, are not working. Under MHA only 2,000 out of 700,000 modification in process have become permanent. Considering that there were 2.7 million loans eligible for that one program, the percentage is scary - 7/100ths of 1% (or .0007 for decimal lovers)

If you are facing a foreclosure or might be in the near future because of a job loss or cut-back, illness, marriage, baby, or just bad money management you should act now. First, contact the lenders loss mitigation department or its "troubled borrower" department. Ask what they can do to help. If you were out of work for 3 months and are just that same 3 months behind, you should be able to work out a plan quickly. I say "should" because even easy problems can be made into full blown wars .

If you have received a notice that states that the Lender is or intending to foreclose, CALL A LAWYER who works in one or more of the areas of foreclosure prevention, predatory lending, loan modifications, and bankruptcy. This is not the kind of problem that will go away. Do not think by not picking-up that certified mail that you are safe! THE WORLD WILL NOT REVOLVE AROUND YOU.

The following link is to an interview of me by a local television host, Andrew Cort, DC, JD. It describes how it came to pass that mortgages were bad and foreclosures happen in Mass. at the rate of 125 each day.

Spend the time to watch the video. I may not be pretty, but the words are worth it (Just close your eyes and LISTEN!).

http://www.andrewcort.com/spirit12RichardIsacoff.html

Money Money Everywhere But....

The money supply to Banks is there. Interest rates for Bank borrowing is still near 0%. But, homeowners are now subject to much tighter rules for borrowing because the Banks follow the BOOK, or in this case the Federal Reserve Regs. As a result, home mortgages are MORE DIFFICULT to get than anytime in the past decade or two.

There are new rules to try to reign in the high-cost, so-called "subprime" predatory loans. As of October 1st "High Cost Loans" have a new definition: any loan that is "1.5 percentage points" above the average prime mortgage rate. (Note: that is not the prime rate mortgage index but a prime rate mortgage - a mortgage given to a "prime borrower" or a so-called "a" borrower - great credit). If a loan is a "high-cost loan" under the new definition lenders must verify that the borrower can repay the loan through earnings and other income, not simply by a foreclosure or refinance.

That rule may not appear to be a departure from the "old" way but it is. The crisis we are still in was caused by some large lenders/brokers making loans to anyone who could pass a basic screening:"Can you hear thunder and see lightning?". Greedy and ignorant brokers/lenders would often give loans to borrowers without requiring any proof of the borrowers ability to pay.

Sometimes the borrowers knew exactly what they were doing and did not care - they gambled that the market for houses would keep rising and that they could refinance their way out of any problem There were no verifications of employment or verifications of deposits send. No bank statements showing a steady balance, for the self employed were requested, and often, for employed borrowers, W-2 copies were ignored or not sought.

Basically, the new rules that the Federal Reserve has put into effect as of October 1, 2009, merely force lenders/brokers AND borrowers to do what they should have been doing all along. That borrowers would fabricate income and lie on applications was ignored, or even encouraged.

Some states, like Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and a handful of others across the country have already put regulations in place that make the lender/broker certify that the loan is in the best interests of the borrower. In fact, Massachusetts REQUIRES this criteria be met for high cost loans, as defined by the Commonwealth General Laws. Also, many states, Massachusetts among them, have enacted legislation or have had the highest court in the state rule that certain threshold questions (like can the borrower repay and is does the loan lower payments or allow for home improvements, or lengthen the term) must be met on a refinance before the lender/broker can consider itself safe from violating such laws. UNFORTUNATELY, many of the National Banks, and some Savings Institutions governed by the Office of Thrift Supervision, claim that state law does NOT apply to them.

The Federal Reserve Rules also state, in part, that Prepayment penalties are banned if the mortgage payment can change in the initial four years of the loan. For other higher-priced, mortgage loans, a prepayment penalty period cannot last for more than two years. (this is the link to the 65 page Regulation:

http://www.federalreserve.gov/reportforms/formsreview/RegZ_20080109_ifr.pdf

Banks have over-reacted so NO MONEY TO HOMEOWNERS. Foreclosure proceedings are still climbing. The worst may not be over for the average homeowner who has a financial problem, or a first-time home buyer who does not have a high (700s) credit score.

Author's Copyright by Richard I. Isacoff, Esq, October 2009

http://www.isacofflaw.com/
rii@isacofflaw.com

Good News/Bad News - Is There a Difference?

Foreclosures are up 23% from the end of the 3rd quarter last year. Foreclosures are up 5% from the end of the second quarter this year. If the numbers continue, this year will have more foreclosures than any before. THAT'S THE GOOD NEWS!

With all of the money given (loaned) to banks, and with the likes of JPMorgan Chase having a profit for the last quarter of $3,600,000,000 ($3.6 Billion), having doubled the amount of money it has planned on for loan losses, you might think that there would be money for you to borrow to refinance your house (after all your credit is good ), or borrow for your business. WRONG - THINK AGAIN! Banks are bracing for the next wave of losses; commercial real estate mortgage backed securities failing because the loans that make up the securities are defaulting. Additionally, because of the financial crisis we are still in, the "normal" way of making loans will not work.

In the April 13th posting (and several others), the whole issue of securitization was explained. The basics: agree to buy a large number of mortgages so that the value, on paper, of what the security maker controls is huge, like $1 Billion. Rather than holding the loans in any Bank, and risking borrowers not paying the mortgage regularly, sell the loans in a package (pool) to investors on Wall Street; investors like mutual funds, individuals, pensions, and of course the Federal Government. So now the $1 Billion portfolio is owned by thousands of people, plans etc. The security eliminates the risk of loss for all of the banks involved in making the loans, because no bank owns one of the actual mortgages - not one. Investors, not lenders/banks, each own a small portion of the pool. Again, they own a security, that acts like a corporate bond, but not a mortgage.

Because of the recent losses and the enormous rise in foreclosures, no one wants to buy these mortgage-backed securities ("MBS"). If no one will buy them, then they will not be created, because the creator does not want to get stuck with a long-term investment (pooled mortgages). If they are not being created, the banks will not lend; even to good borrowers. THIS IS THE BAD NEWS.

There will be no real recovery until credit is available again. The government's mortgage lenders FannieMae and FreddieMac, FHA, have new and very strict guidelines. If you have a blemish on your credit report, NO LOAN.

Businesses use borrowed money all of the time to keep operations running, to buy new equipment, and to expand. If banks won't lend to them, the business shrinks and dies. More jobs are lost, and not just at that business. if people lose work, then they cannot spend money and other businesses fail. That is the cycle we are in for unemployment. And more unemployment means more defaults on mortgage payments, and that means more foreclosures.

The new Bank regulations that will require banks to keep more money set aside for bad loans, and the fact that only the Federal Government will buy the existing MBS and not new ones, means that Banks will not make loans, except to the very best customers. The noose gets tighter and tighter. The recent run-up of the stock market is not a reflection of consumers’ and "Main Street" types’ (us) confidence. The profits are being made by traders, Wall Street professionals, and companies like JPMorgan Chase.

So, the very kinds of investments, the MBS or pools of mortgages, that allowed the housing boon, has led us to the housing boom - it’s imploded. Breaking the cycle we are in will take time; actually a great deal of it

"Making Home Affordable" Program Is Not Working

The Obama administration's Making Home Affordable program, you know the one to stop foreclosures on millions of homes, is missing the mark. As was reported in the New York Times by Peter Goodman in today's edition, "The Congressional Oversight Panel, created last year to keep tabs on taxpayer bailout funds, said the Obama administration’s program would prevent fewer than half of predicted foreclosures." (To read his full story go to http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/10/business/10modify.html ).

Mr. Goodman's article discusses the overriding problems with the program, but does not deal with the situation from a day-to-day point of view. In reality, the Obama Program, as it is called, (which is really named Making Home Affordable ("MHA"), and has under it two programs - Home Affordability Modification Program "HAMP" and the Home Affordability Refinance Program "HARP") does not accomplish the goal of home preservation.

Basically, if a homeowner is behind now, but was current as of January 1, 2009, and meets other criteria, the homeowner should be eligible for a loan modification. The modification allows the participating lender to set up a 3 month trial period wherein the borrower makes affordable payments based on actual financial information submitted to the lender, after which the lender can decide to modify the loan or not. The terms are dictated by the lender and may not ever become permanent.

The most disturbing part of the situation is that homeowners are going into foreclosure at a record rate, and the programs at best are being outpaced by the foreclosures by 3 or 4 to 1. Elizabeth Warren, head of the TARP Oversight panel, estimates that even when everything is working at full speed, the programs will lose the battle against foreclosure schedules by 2 to 1. The honest homeowner who "bought" a mortgage without really understanding the terms and was sold "a bill of goods", like thinking he/she had a 30 year fixed mortgage when in reality the rate changed after 3 years, has no recourse.

The lenders, Wall Street folks, and investors, who pushed and packaged these loans, and now do not want to take any loss of income, are not being held accountable. They still have no risk of loss. Taxpayers, meaning the homeowners who are in trouble, are the ones paying the entire cost of the programs, YET CANNOT EVEN GET HELP IN MOST CIRCUMSTANCES.

With the jobless rate being reported at near 10%, which means it is probably over15% (people off benefits and not looking anymore are not reported), and layoffs continuing, more and more people will be a situation where foreclosure is inevitable. The MHA could work, but not without the full cooperation from the lenders and mortgage servicers. With no one being in charge to enforce ACTIVE participation in MHA, and there being no regulator with teeth to force compliance, the people who own the loans will not allow the programs to work. They will lose money if modifications become permanent. Guess who wins this battle.

For now, it's the only game in town. If you are facing foreclosure, apply for an MHA program. Once it's determined you are eligible, any foreclosure action is put on hold while your application is considered.

(A correction from 9/28/2009 post: I incorrectly stated that Rep. Barney Frank was from Western MA. He is, of course, from Eastern MA)

Author's Copyright by Richard I. Isacoff, Esq, October 2009

rii@isacofflaw.com
www.isacofflaw.com