Showing posts with label fee income. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fee income. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Debit Cards and Colleges; An Unholy Alliance

Colleges are courting the Devil - the Debit Card Devil. Debt counseling and money management are urgently needed on Campus! Hard pressed for funds, Colleges are resorting to "quiet" side deals to the detriment of its students. By this time most students are aware of some of the traps in credit cards, especially the killer default interest rates. The implication or at least the inference drawn by most people is that Debit Cards Are Safe:. THEY'RE NOT!

During the summer break, students and their parents, guardians, sponsors etc. should pay attention to the increasing use of, and demand for, Debit Cards on College Campuses by the Colleges themselves. The furor over credit card interest and fees has quieted (for now) but a more insidious replacement has arisen; Debit Cards.

A PIRG study, demonstrates that debit card using students have traded a headache for an upset stomach (I realize that shows my age but...). I was a banker for 18 years and ran failed banks and S&Ls for FSLIC and then FDIC. That part of me wants to delve into the extent the colleges have accepted payoffs for signing contracts with Debit Card Issuers that expose their students to legitimized financial crimes; transaction fees, overdraft fees, annual fees, a fee for being late paying a fee...

The Consumer Finance Protection Board ("CFPB") should jump into this mess but it has its hands full, especially with a Congress beholding to the Banking industry. In the meantime States' AGs could take up the fight. It will be easier than the Student Loan problem which is not getting any better in the near and maybe distant future. Here there are no issues with Federal agencies being the card issuers.

Every college, with an agreement with a debit card issuer, should be forced as part of disclosure regulations to explain, in plain English, with documentation provided, how much the college is receiving and what "arrangements" were made with the administration, development office, and financial aid office for starters.

Oh, and maybe, as a mandatory Freshman year course, all colleges should have a 1 credit course in financial management covering topics like budgeting, all forms of plastic, the full cost of attending school, and the probable length of time it will take to pay back student loans. In fact, maybe the college should have to credit each debit card user with student loans, at least one-half of the fees the college received to the Student's student loans

Author's Copyright by Richard Isacoff, Esq, July 2012
rii@isacofflaw.com
http://www.isacofflaw.com/

Sunday, November 29, 2009

Instant Transfers, Instant Profits (for Banks) - UPDATED


In the Banking sub-sector of Financial Services, there is a process in effect which will make the Banking business substantially more profitable, although at the risk of customer dissatisfaction. "Check21" is a 1year old law that allows banks and any other business to accept checks as EFT (Electronic Funds Transfer) debits to the customer (like a debit card- immediate withdrawal) , and EFT credits to the bank. This eliminates "float" for all practical purposes (the time people writing checks had from paying a bill or buying something and the time when it actually posts to the customers' account.) You won't have the 1 day's grace when you write a check until it clears.

When ATMs and POS (point-of-sale) terminals were first introduced in the early 1980s, there was an insufficient infra-structure to support the wide-spread use of them and to generate their true value. Many transactions were simply captured electronically and still processed in "batch". Checks were still checks with float. Now, with the Internet providing the connectivity needed, banks can move to eliminate checks as we know them. Even mail order/bill pay by check services are processing checks as EFT (instant debit to your account, instant credit to theirs) occurrences. With the first significant upward movement of interest rates, the issue will become moot. All transactions will be electronic; there will be no more checks

Checks in the clearing process take 1-2 days ("float") to be processed, or possibly longer if it is a "foreign" item. For every $100 million in float, and for each 1% increase in the rates being paid or earned by a bank, for each day of float the difference amounts to $1 million dollars annually. Assuming rates move back to 5% from the current 0.5% in 2-3 years, and a large bank has $1 billion in float for 1 day, there is $45 million per year in earnings, either gained/retained or lost. Further, the cost in manpower and technology to process the incoming & outgoing checks and other items is staggering.

In the mid 1980s I wrote a paper on this issue for a Mutual Savings Bank trade publication. Remember that those were the days of 10%-15% interest. Even a $2 million per day float cost $200,000-$300,000 a year. Seems small now but it was not then. The issue preventing the change to all electronics was the lack of the Internet. Every device had to be a direct connection; even the ATMs were on dedicated lines. That obstacle is gone. Add to the equation the fact that checks cannot be processed faster without them ending up shredded in the machines, and the machines need time to read the manually typed numbers that reside on the bottom of items showing the amount of the transaction.

Currently there is a debate in Congress about Banks' fee income - overdraft charges, ATM fees, etc. Fee income is the line item all Banks are trying to get; there is no risk like there is in loans. A move to all EFT debits and credits, such as checks, deposits and charges, will result in instant profits for Banks. But then again, so have 30% interest rate credit cards.