"Making Home Affordable" Program Is Not Working

The Obama administration's Making Home Affordable program, you know the one to stop foreclosures on millions of homes, is missing the mark. As was reported in the New York Times by Peter Goodman in today's edition, "The Congressional Oversight Panel, created last year to keep tabs on taxpayer bailout funds, said the Obama administration’s program would prevent fewer than half of predicted foreclosures." (To read his full story go to http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/10/business/10modify.html ).

Mr. Goodman's article discusses the overriding problems with the program, but does not deal with the situation from a day-to-day point of view. In reality, the Obama Program, as it is called, (which is really named Making Home Affordable ("MHA"), and has under it two programs - Home Affordability Modification Program "HAMP" and the Home Affordability Refinance Program "HARP") does not accomplish the goal of home preservation.

Basically, if a homeowner is behind now, but was current as of January 1, 2009, and meets other criteria, the homeowner should be eligible for a loan modification. The modification allows the participating lender to set up a 3 month trial period wherein the borrower makes affordable payments based on actual financial information submitted to the lender, after which the lender can decide to modify the loan or not. The terms are dictated by the lender and may not ever become permanent.

The most disturbing part of the situation is that homeowners are going into foreclosure at a record rate, and the programs at best are being outpaced by the foreclosures by 3 or 4 to 1. Elizabeth Warren, head of the TARP Oversight panel, estimates that even when everything is working at full speed, the programs will lose the battle against foreclosure schedules by 2 to 1. The honest homeowner who "bought" a mortgage without really understanding the terms and was sold "a bill of goods", like thinking he/she had a 30 year fixed mortgage when in reality the rate changed after 3 years, has no recourse.

The lenders, Wall Street folks, and investors, who pushed and packaged these loans, and now do not want to take any loss of income, are not being held accountable. They still have no risk of loss. Taxpayers, meaning the homeowners who are in trouble, are the ones paying the entire cost of the programs, YET CANNOT EVEN GET HELP IN MOST CIRCUMSTANCES.

With the jobless rate being reported at near 10%, which means it is probably over15% (people off benefits and not looking anymore are not reported), and layoffs continuing, more and more people will be a situation where foreclosure is inevitable. The MHA could work, but not without the full cooperation from the lenders and mortgage servicers. With no one being in charge to enforce ACTIVE participation in MHA, and there being no regulator with teeth to force compliance, the people who own the loans will not allow the programs to work. They will lose money if modifications become permanent. Guess who wins this battle.

For now, it's the only game in town. If you are facing foreclosure, apply for an MHA program. Once it's determined you are eligible, any foreclosure action is put on hold while your application is considered.

(A correction from 9/28/2009 post: I incorrectly stated that Rep. Barney Frank was from Western MA. He is, of course, from Eastern MA)

Author's Copyright by Richard I. Isacoff, Esq, October 2009

rii@isacofflaw.com
www.isacofflaw.com

Credit Cards - Rep. Barney Frank's Frustration (Mine Also)

Rep. Barney Frank (D), Congressman from Western MA, wants to "push up" the effective date of the new Credit Card regulations. He is prompted by the frenzy of card issuers raising rates, cutting limits, changing terms, and adding fees, all to beat the starting date of the laws. The laws merely set limits on how and how often card companies can change the terms of the agreement you have with them, without prior notice.

The standard argument, that there is no contract unless both sides agree, is not able to be put forth, because in the agreement you signed originally you gave the company the right to make all of these changes, even to your detriment. Is it fair? NO!, Is it legal? Yes, but only until the first of the year.

Congressman Frank's frustration is understandable, especially if you have a card and have been "slammed" by the card company with rates and fees you never anticipated. That these same companies, CitiBank, Bank of America, Chase, all have Federal Money from the bailout is beside the point. As stated in an earlier post, this is how they were able to report record earnings last quarter.

Congress will not change the date to October as Congressman Frank wants, but at least the issue is again being discussed. Unfortunately, the Congressman may suffer a decline in his credibility with his colleagues, but he will have a boost from his constituents.

Right now, everyone should be examining his/her cards and statements to determine if the terms have suddenly changes, if rates are higher, credit limits lower. If you need a card try a local financial institution. If none issue cards, shop for a new one, if yours is not playing fair. Be certain that you read the "Agreement and Terms" disclosure that will be your contract, BEFORE you use the card. Do not hesitate to decline the card even after it is issued to you. Be certain however, that you follow the rules on terminating the relationship or you could find an open credit line, detracting from your credit score, all the while believing that the card account was closed.

To be safe about credit, whether it is cards, loans, mortgages, joint accounts, "authorized user" cards (where the credit is based on someone else who has given you a card to use), get at least one credit report every six months. They are free from http://www.annualcreditreport.com/ .

Check to be certain that only the cards you use are open. Close everything else. While there may be a slight drop in your credit score (see posts of 7/27/09 and 6/11/09), the risk is far less than if you have unused and unwanted open credit lines affecting your score and overall credit standing.

Author's Copyright by Richard I. Isacoff, Esq, September, 2009

rii@isacofflaw.com

http://www.isacofflaw.com/